DA14681-01000A92

RF Transceiver ICS Overview

The DA14681-01000A92 is a System-on-Chip integrating an ARM Cortex-M0 core with a Bluetooth Low Energy transceiver. It operates at 2.4GHz and supports Bluetooth v4.2 protocols. The device features 64kB OTP, 128kB ROM, and 144kB SRAM memory. It functions within a supply voltage range of 1.7V to 4.5V. The component utilizes a 60-VQFN package with dual rows and an exposed pad for surface mount installation.

RF Transceiver ICS Feature Summary

• Integrates application processor, memories, cryptography engine, and power management unit on a single chip.
• Provides low-power wireless connectivity for rechargeable devices via Bluetooth Smart 4.x.
• Supports multiple serial interfaces including I2C, I2S, PCM, SPI, UART, and USB.

RF Transceiver ICS Applications

• Smart home device connectivity
• Rechargeable wearable electronics
• Proximity sensing solutions

RF Transceiver ICS Procurement Notes

Verify the current status as Not Recommended for New Designs (NRND). Confirm availability through authorized distributors due to potential minimum order quantity restrictions. Check for Product Change Notices regarding label updates or packaging modifications before finalizing procurement plans.

RF Transceiver ICS Selection Notes

Select this component for applications requiring integrated BLE connectivity and processing in a compact form factor. Ensure the design accommodates the 60-VQFN package dimensions. Verify that the system voltage requirements align with the 1.7V to 4.5V operating range.

RF Transceiver ICS Part Context

This part belongs to the Renesas SmartBond™ series, designed for flexible IoT applications. It combines RF transceiver capabilities with MCU functionality, eliminating the need for separate components. The series targets energy-efficient wireless communication needs in consumer electronics.

RF Transceiver ICS Replacement Considerations

Direct substitute: DA14683-01000A92. Note that the DA14683 supports Bluetooth v5.0 instead of v4.2. Evaluate firmware compatibility and protocol differences when considering this alternative.